<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hiding suckyness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thiagoarrais.com/2009/02/17/hiding-suckyness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thiagoarrais.com/2009/02/17/hiding-suckyness/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, ideas and useless ranting about software development and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Cady</title>
		<link>http://blog.thiagoarrais.com/2009/02/17/hiding-suckyness/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Cady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thiagoarrais.com/?p=6#comment-5</guid>
		<description>It all depends on how available you want to make your tool.  The more specialization your tool requires of its users, the fewer users your tool will be capable of having.  For example, MediaWiki&#039;s version control is idiot proof, allowing the world&#039;s idiots to create Wikipedia.  In this case there is no doing away with them: there are not enough non-idiots in the world (i.e., people who will ever learn git) to write something as big as Wikipedia.

My point is only that excluding &quot;idiots&quot; (non-specialists) is not always desirable or even possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on how available you want to make your tool.  The more specialization your tool requires of its users, the fewer users your tool will be capable of having.  For example, MediaWiki&#8217;s version control is idiot proof, allowing the world&#8217;s idiots to create Wikipedia.  In this case there is no doing away with them: there are not enough non-idiots in the world (i.e., people who will ever learn git) to write something as big as Wikipedia.</p>
<p>My point is only that excluding &#8220;idiots&#8221; (non-specialists) is not always desirable or even possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco Trindade</title>
		<link>http://blog.thiagoarrais.com/2009/02/17/hiding-suckyness/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco Trindade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thiagoarrais.com/?p=6#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Agreed, but IMO we still have to realize that people make mistakes.

It doesnt matter how professional and competent you are, there is always room to be wrong some times.

That&#039;s kind my view  about git. It is really good and I will still use it, but it allows you to do wrong things really easily, what could sometimes be a bad idea.

Cheers,
Francisco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, but IMO we still have to realize that people make mistakes.</p>
<p>It doesnt matter how professional and competent you are, there is always room to be wrong some times.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s kind my view  about git. It is really good and I will still use it, but it allows you to do wrong things really easily, what could sometimes be a bad idea.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Francisco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
